A couple of weeks ago, I came across a post online which informed me that people were trying to get a law passed in Georgia which would allow gay students to be expelled from public schools. I was rather surprised by the post because a) I'm generally pretty up to date on this type of thing and I hadn't heard about it at all and b) there's been enough negative publicity about Tennessee's "don't say gay" bill that I would have assumed that this would have been added onto that.
Anyway, the post, which had gotten tons of notes of support and reblogs, linked to a petition, so I went there to see if there was any more information. The petition still didn't have a particularly coherent explanation. It made said that over 100 schools in Georgia don't allow gay students and that these schools were receiving public funding. The petition, if anything, confused me more, as it sound as though different Georgia schools had different policies with regards to whether gay students would be expelled. At the bottom of the petition, there was a link to a New York Times article, so I clicked that in hopes that the article would explain what in the world was going on.
What I learned in reading the article was that the schools involved in this are private schools. And that changes everything. Basically, what's happening is that in Georgia, state money is being used for scholarships to private schools, some of which don't allow gay students. And see, that's a completely different story. Georgia public schools banning gay students and Georgia giving money to private schools some of which ban gay student are two very different things.
Now I'm not saying that I agree with these schools' policies at all. Personally, I think that the policies are awful. But that's part of private school, they get to make their own rules about this type of thing. And if they're a religious school who wants to make rules about gay students attending their school, that's their prerogative. Whether the government is allowed to fund scholarships to these schools is a question of constitutionality and separation of church and state stuff, and honestly, I don't know if it's allowed or not.
My main point is, please look before you leap into something on the internet. The fact that the post stating that Georgia public schools planned to ban gay students was reblogged over 40,000 times is concerning. It's awesome that that many people were up in arms about the idea, but the amount of ignorance that people displayed there, supporting something without even knowing what they were really supporting is not a good thing at all.
It also showed a basic lack of logic and understanding of politics. If you think about it, the whole thing really wouldn't make sense because, first of all, where would a gay student go if they got expelled? Wouldn't they have to go to school in a different state? And second of all, the sodomy laws in Georgia were struck down by courts, so why would a state a state in which its not illegal to be gay now allow their students to be gay?
On top of that, the fact that the poorly articulated petition got over 50,000 signatures is concerning. If you were to read the petition, you would think that the petition was being sent to the head of the Department of Education (who isn't the appropriate person to send it to at all, by the way), when in fact, upon closer examination, it is being sent to the Georgia State Schools Superintendent (who is a more appropriate person to send it to). Basically, this petition was super vague and misleading and still managed to get 50,000 signatures.
This ties into something much bigger. With the increased ability to organize and spread awareness through the internet, comes the increased possibility that your true message will get mixed up with misinformation or lost completely along the way. Now that people can show their support with just a click of their mouse, they don't even bother to understand what they're supporting. People need to be careful to make sure that they know what it is that they're supporting instead of blindly supporting a cause which may or may not really exist. With increased access come an increased responsibility to check things out before we jump onto the bandwagon.
0 comments:
Post a Comment