This is a reflection that I wrote for my media class about the documentary which a partner and I spent the last three months working on (with some of the most boring parts cut out). I planned to write something a little more interesting this week, but it just didn't work out. Sorry about that. This post relates to my previous post about PFOX. If you care to look at it.
I worked with Brianna to create a
documentary about the organization Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays or PFOX. PFOX is an organization that advocates for the rights of people who
identify as ex-gay, in other words, people who have gone through reparative therapy
or other processes and believe that they are no longer gay. It is, in theory,
made up of people who are the parents and friends of those who identify as
either ex-gay or gay.
I suggested this topic because last year, PFOX handed out
fliers at Blair, explaining their message in extremely convoluted language that
really boiled down to “you don’t have to be gay”. As a teenager who is an
active member of Blair’s Gay-Straight alliance and who identifies as a member
of the LGBTQA community, I was personally offended by the fliers. At the time, I
did a fair amount of research on PFOX, but when presented with the opportunity
to make a documentary, I hoped I could find out more about their perspective.
We
originally set out to write an impartial piece about what PFOX was and what it
stood for. Because of their refusal to talk to us, the piece became much more
biased, ultimately being about the inconsistencies and intolerance within the
group.
I don’t regret
picking PFOX as the topic of the documentary; however, I did find it a frustrating
topic. I’m not sure that there is much left to explore about PFOX. There isn't that much information about them to be found. Their is really only two very polarized versions of their story to be found. One by them and those who agree with them, and one by those who are very strong supporters of LGBTQ rights. No one else seems to care enough to pay much attention to them.
I think that the choice of topic shapes the
whole documentary project. Our topic turned out to be about a subject who
refused to talk to us and about which there wasn't that much information or
b-roll to be found. Because of this, our final product was very different from
that of a group whose subject was willing to be interviewed and who had plenty
of sources of b-roll.
One of the most surprising things that I learned
from this project is how small the organization PFOX really is. When I began
this project, I knew that they had sued Montgomery County repeatedly and had a
history of handing out their fliers to different schools. Based on that, I assumed
that they were a large and well established organization with a big membership.
What became abundantly clear as I worked on this documentary is that PFOX was
actually a tiny organization and most likely just a front for the Family
Research Council to reach out to schools.
My group faced
many challenges in this project, from technical difficulties (we had to try
five computers before we finally found one that worked, one of our interviews
got deleted, our computer wound up being used to film the school play and went
missing for a few class periods, etc.) to issues with final cut (some of our audio
clips were individually locked and it took us a couple of days to figure out
how to fix it) to issues with the topic itself (PFOX refused to talk to us, there was lots of drama over whether PFOX would sue us, there was no footage available anywhere of anyone in PFOX doing anything but talking) to the fact
that one of our group members dropped out of CAP halfway through the project.
It was one of those projects in which everything that could possibly go wrong
has gone wrong.
I’d probably say that our biggest challenge was that PFOX was
not an active organization who did much of anything, but was really just a
website. Because of that, it was impossible to find b-roll footage of people
who were a part of PFOX doing anything besides talking. We tried to overcome
this by using still frames and pictures; however, in my opinion, the lack of
b-roll made our documentary less interesting.
In spite of all of
the problems that we had throughout this project, I did enjoy myself and I did
learn a lot, both about PFOX and about the documentary making process. The
subject of the ex-gay movement as a whole and groups which oppose homosexuality
is one which interests me immensely. Although I completely disagree with their beliefs,
I am of the opinion that the best way to counter beliefs with which you
disagree is to learn more about the root of those beliefs and the people who
hold them. This project has given me the opportunity to do that to a depth
which I most likely would not have otherwise. In addition, this project was the
first time that I felt somewhat confident in using Final Cut and editing. Overall,
although this wasn't the smoothest of processes, I do think that it was
beneficial to my experience in CAP.
0 comments:
Post a Comment